A Neutral Agency
Within the InterStream economy, the Escrow
and Metering company fulfills a vital role. The Escrow &
Metering provider must remain neutral to all parties exchanging
traffic. nuMetra,
InterStream's selected Escrow & Metering provider is contracted by
the association and must meet specific requirements.
The function of an escrow agent, in any
economy is to insure that both parties in the transaction fulfill
their contractual obligations. As the parties buy and sell services
from one another, the system must enable settlement to occur in
exchange for the service being delivered. In the InterStream
system, this function is provided by the Escrow and Metering company nuMetra. By metering the streaming transaction to insure that the contracted service quality is provided, nuMetra
escrows payment for the service and then settles and thus clears the
transaction. In the aggregate, this is analogous to the New York or
NASDAQ Stock Exchanges functions. The stock exchanges aggregate all
sources through which stocks can be acquired and transactions cleared.
Each InterStream transaction follows a prescribed process by the certified Escrow and Metering Service. For
each transaction, the service (1) validates receipt
of digital currency into transaction escrow, (2)
performs network admission control, then (3) verifies
that the transaction met the required performance metric
before (4) releasing escrow for settlement and (5) ultimately clearing the transaction.
“Settlement” for each transaction means
that the escrow of digital currency distributed in real-time
to the providers of the premium bandwidth and content.
It is independent of any centralized book entry accounting
system. This settlement is said to be “broker-less,”
occurring automatically upon satisfaction of the performance
metric. Why is it broker-less?
By definition, an “open market” requires
the support of a clearinghouse function. The InterStream
Escrowed Settlement Architecture will create an open market
for a new commodity: premium bandwidth. The current
commodity called best-effort bandwidth is sold on a
"per-byte" (typically hosting centers & CDNs) or "per-bit" (IP transit) basis using a economic agreement.
The InterStream architecture provides for the ability to
differentiate bandwidth performance guarantees and service
levels, thereby enabling a monetizing a new service beyond
best-effort. Broadband Service Providers can
now differentiate services on both volume and quality,
as well as promote new broadband offerings.
Broker services are commonly used with a
commodities exchange to enable independent buyers with the ability to
purchase. With perfect knowledge of the terms of the transactions,
brokers can act as arbitrageurs. They may buying commodities at
low bid price in one market and selling them at a higher price in
another.
Like a commodities exchange, the InterStream architecture
enables remote buyers to acquire premium bandwidth from
service providers without pre-existing contracts or
physical connections in a particular Internet Exchange
(IX). However, there is no broker in the InterStream
model. The asking price is always paid exactly. For
enabling the real-time escrowed-metering system, InterStream
will receive a fixed transaction fee. This eliminates
any arbitrage loss to the bandwidth and content sellers
while also radically reducing the cost of each transaction.
Government regulation, specifications from industry
standards bodies and mandated controls on peering are
not required to enable a healthy economy for premium
bandwidth. Instead, the economy and its associated services
could grow organically if based on the InterStream model.
We forecast that as support for Escrowed Settlement grows,
the overall settlement system will evolve through a
network effect and thus expand exponentially. As a neutral,
cross industry owned business, InterStream will define
initial implementations that benefit all participants.
The important question is whether a broker
or escrow service could best fulfill the role of the “neutral
agency” described in this discussion. A full understanding of the
issues leads the ISP to favor a neutral escrow model. By comparison,
the principal drawback of a broker model is its complete lack of
neutrality. Brokers possess complete knowledge of all transaction would
inevitably engage in "perfect arbitrage" as any economy evolves. That
approach would neither benefit buyers nor sellers inevitably harm to
overall economy. The mult-tier Internet is ready to start and expand,
and the InterStream architecture provides the necessary new economic
model for a healthy Internet rather new government regulation.
|